ABSTRACT
Introduction: The transfusion of emergency blood is an essential part of haemostatic resuscitation. Locally, where direct access to a blood bank is limited, emergency blood is stored within emergency centres. It was previously suggested that stored blood provides inadequate volumes compared to what is needed. Minimal data are available regarding indications for emergency blood usage. We aimed to describe the utilisation of emergency blood in selected Cape Town emergency centres. Materials and methods :A cross-sectional study was carried out at three secondary level emergency centres (no blood bank), and one tertiary centre (with a blood bank). Data from emergency blood recipients were recorded over a three-month study period. Indications for transfusion, number of units and location of transfusion were recorded. Indications and usage location were described in numbers and proportions. Results : A total of 329 emergency blood units were transfused to 210 patients. Trauma accounted for 39% (nâ¯=â¯81) of cases and other surgical conditions for 22% (nâ¯=â¯47), particularly upper gastrointestinal 11% (nâ¯=â¯24) and perioperative bleeding 8% (nâ¯=â¯16). Medical conditions accounted for 15% (nâ¯=â¯31), with anaemia 13% (nâ¯=â¯27), the most prevalent indication. Gynaecological conditions accounted for 15% (nâ¯=â¯32), mostly ectopic pregnancy 8% (nâ¯=â¯17). The majority of emergency blood, 77% (nâ¯=â¯253) were used in the emergency centres or operating theatres, 6% (nâ¯=â¯21).Conclusion :Trauma remains a major indication for emergency blood transfusion in this setting. This study questions the use of emergency blood for certain non-urgent diagnoses (i.e. anaemia). Given the scarcity of this resource and limitations to access, appropriate use of emergency blood needs to be better defined locally. Ongoing monitoring of the indications for which emergency blood is used, improved transfusion stewardship and better systems to access emergency blood should be a priority in this setting